joelisaak

Joel Isaak Artists Page

  • Lay Your Burdens Down
  • Home
  • Recent Works
  • Media Coverage
  • Shows
  • Resume/CV
  • Past Works

Faust

Posted by joelisaak on March 5, 2012
Posted in: Online Class. 1 Comment

Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

Faust

1832, Germany

Faust is appealing to the middle class because it addresses the new opportunities that the middle class was coming into.  It addresses things like philosophy, religion, science, classical Greek Culture, and love.  Goethe establishes the character of Faust, who is not unsatisfied with life and makes a deal with the devil to give up his soul in exchange for essentially magical helper in order for Faust to try to achieve the pinnacle of human satisfaction and pleasure.  The bargaining chip is Faust’s soul.  Faust goes on this journey of life living a party play boy lifestyle in which he falls in love with a young innocent girl, Gretchen, who he ultimately seduces, and he falls in love with classical Greek Helen, who evades him.  In the end Faust is damned to Hell, but due to Gretchen’s pleadings in heaven and Faust’s overall movement towards good throughout the play he is granted entry into heaven. 

Faust is a scholar who has lost his zeal for life.  The government wanted to show the middle class people that too much enlightenment leaves one feeling empty and lifeless.  In a time period when “crazy” and “dangerous” things like Encyclopedia’s were being made the average person now had access to general knowledge giving the middle class more power, and plays like Faust were a good source of propaganda to help detour the middle class from becoming a threat to the government and aristocrats.

The government also did a good job by showing that a path that strives towards goodness will save you in the end and that heaven is merciful.  It is great Public Relations spin if you ask me.

Goethe’s Faust was written over a 60 year time period in Germany and published the year after he died.  It reflects the changing tactics that the government used, to censor and influence the people,  especially the middle class of this time.  Goethe did a good job hooking a large audience with his work by depicting scenes of lawlessness that might appeal to the darker side of people.  Topics like wealth, knowledge, revenge, and sex were all used to show the path not to go down.  Goethe’s version differed from previous versions because he finishes the play with Faust going to heaven because he overall sought good over bad on his path through life and through his deal with the devil.

I like Faust because of its complexity and I find works of art that are propagandic in nature to be fascinating.  I think it shows a glimpse into the cultural issues that were present at the time and enjoy that it was able to be official sanctioned because of how well it was put together.

http://www.gradesaver.com/goethes-faust/study-guide/major-themes/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faust#Goethe.27s_Faust

http://www.online-literature.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3107

MEPHISTOPHELES: Poor son of Earth, how couldst thou thus alone

Have led thy life, bereft of me?

I, for a time, at least, have worked thy cure;

Thy fancy’s rickets plague thee not at all:

Had I not been, so hadst thou, sure,

Walked thyself off this earthly ball.

Why here to caverns, rocky hollows slinking,

Sit’st thou, as ’twere an owl a-blinking?

Why suck’st, from sodden moss and dripping stone,

Toad-like, thy nourishment alone?

A fine way, this, thy time to fill!

A blessing drawn from supernatural fountains!

In night and dew to lie upon the mountains;

All Heaven and Earth in rapture penetrating;

Thyself to Godhood haughtily inflating;

To grub with yearning force through Earth’s dark marrow,

Compress the six days’ work within thy bosom narrow,–

To taste, I know not what, in haughty power,

Thine own ecstatic life on all things shower,

Thine earthly self behind thee cast,

And then the lofty instinct, thus– [With a gesture:] at last,–

I daren’t say how — to pluck the final flower!

Yes, thou findest that unpleasant!

Thou hast the moral right to cry me “shame!” at present.

One dares not that before chaste ears declare,

Which chaste hearts, notwithstanding, cannot spare;

And, once for all, I grudge thee not the pleasure

Of lying to thyself in moderate measure.

But such a course thou wilt not long endure;

Already art thou o’er-excited,

And, if it last, wilt soon be plighted

To madness and to horror, sure.

Enough of that! Thy love sits lonely yonder,

By all things saddened and oppressed;

Her thoughts and yearning seek thee, tenderer, fonder,–

A mighty love is in her breast.

First came thy passion’s flood and poured around her

As when from melted snow a streamlet overflows;

Thou hast therewith so filled and drowned her,

That now thy stream all shallow shows.

Methinks, instead of in the forests lording,

The noble Sir should find it good,

The love of this young silly blood

At once to set about rewarding.

Her time is miserably long;

She haunts her window, watching clouds that stray

O’er the old city-wall, and far away.

“Were I a little bird!” so runs her song,

Day long, and half night long.

Now she is lively, mostly sad,

Now, wept beyond her tears;

Then again quiet she appears,–

Always love-mad!

Thou fool, go in and comfort her!

When such a head as thine no outlet knows,

It thinks the end must soon occur.

Hail him, who keeps a steadfast mind!

Thou, else, dost well the devil-nature wear:

Naught so insipid in the world I find

As is a devil in despair.

http://www.monologuearchive.com/g/goethe_003.html

 

Bernini’s David

Posted by joelisaak on February 23, 2012
Posted in: Online Class. 5 Comments

Gian Lorenzo Bernini

David

1623-24, Rome

Bernini’s David is my favorite David of the four famous David’s.   In truly embodies the Baroque are in a three dimensional form.  It also shows a shift in the religious art of the time as a direct result of the Council of Trent.  The religious art of the Baroque era was supposed to be uplifting, engaging, and have an emotional response to help the view draw closer to God.  I think that the three dimensional work from this time period really shows this the best compared with any other art form because of the way it interacts with architecture and lighting in the space so flawlessly.  After visiting St. Peter’s Basilica I feel very strongly about how powerful three dimensional forms can be on the viewer.  These types of form really create a completely new environment for the viewer and transport the viewer to a new place completely.   Bernini’s David does this spectacularly and fits into the religious iconography code of this time period.

The piece itself stands as a technical marvel in stone.  The dynamic pose and the way the slingshot, for example, is so thinly carved as well as many other details truly shows a mastery of stone carving technique.  Bernini also had a masterful hand at portraying the human body and this portrayal shows the shift in religion, from a more humanistic iconographic depiction of a ideal human like god form, to a more emotional realistic rendering of humanity as an emotional being.  From a visual stand point this David appears older than the previous three David’s by Michelangelo, Verrocchio, and Donatello.  It appears to be the most mature David and most masculine out of the four.   Bernini also broke out into showing the action in motion that David preformed.

Bernini did a fantastic job in evoking drama to the viewer.  The way he developed so many diagonals with the human form is astounding.  I also, as sculptor, appreciate that he was able to integrate the cloth/robe that David is “wearing” to make the figure not nude.  He is still able to show off how amazing he is at sculpting.  It does not make any scenes to me that David would fight Goliath completely naked, granted David did wear no armor, and I think Bernini references this well and tastefully with the covering he used.    The cloth, along with the gesture of the body makes the piece capable of being lit from any angle and still look amazing.  Bernini incorporated all of these features into the piece which really helps to charge the physical space around the statue, and is apparent how one would want to construct a monumental building to match the grandeur of such a fine piece of art.

http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/Bernini-David, retrieved on 2/23/2012

http://www.galleriaborghese.it/borghese/en/edavid.htm, retrieved on 2/23/2012

http://www.sculpturegallery.com/sculpture/david_by_bernini.html, retrieved on 2/23/12

Donatello’s David

Posted by joelisaak on February 15, 2012
Posted in: Online Class. 3 Comments

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Donatello)

Donatello’s David

Donato di Niccolò di Betto Bardi

Florence, 1440’s

I find Donatello’s David to be very interesting.  I don’t find the piece to be extremely beautiful in comparison to other masterworks of sculpture during this time.  The allure for me is the technical skills demonstrated in the metal casting of a bronze statue of this nature and the political statement that the sculpture generates.  Also the figure itself is extremely well rendered and shows a high degree of competency in sculpting ability.  The piece is visually strong and balanced.  There are some discontinuities in the piece that make the piece interesting and more than just a beautiful statue.  These details draw the viewer’s attention to think about why the form has been altered from standard of the more traditional renaissance sculptures of David.   The choices that Donatello made visually read as deliberate because of the skill he had in executing the form.

The form of the body is very famine.  It reminds me of a renaissance marble statue of Aphrodite.  The belly has a fleshy look and is juxtaposed to the more masculine body structure that David ironically is depicted with.  He has long curly hair which is actually historically accurate to Biblical period hair style for David.  However, King David from the Bible would definitely be circumcised and Donatello’s David is not.  Also, the pose while being contra-posto is a feminine pose. The hand gesturing is well rendered and softens the overall appearance of the figure. Goliaths Helmet has wings on it that are not symmetrical, one reaches all the way up the inside of his leg while the other is short.  This draws the viewers’ attention to the back of the figure, and has led many to speculate about the sexual nature of the statue.

The subject matter itself is politically loaded simply by using the portrait of David.  David was a symbol of Florence.  Biblical David represents youth, power, vitality, and kingship supremacy.  So any alteration on this form is a direct reflection of an alteration on Florence as a whole.  The Medici family commissioned the piece and served to act as a political statement of their rebel nature and desire to be upper class and break boundaries.

Homosexuality during this time period was being outlawed just after a period of time when it was social acceptable.  By commissioning a statue of such suggestive nature the Medici’s were bucking a societal rule.  This was a way of demonstrating their power.  The statue also provided a means of displaying their monetary prominence. Bronze statues are extremely expensive and have a connotation of lasting power associated with them.  The Greeks made many bronze statues by commissioning one for themselves the Medici’s were bringing back the technology the Greeks had developed and cementing their Italian Renaissance social status as the highest echelon of wealth and art in Florence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Donatello). Retrieved 2/14/12

http://www.statue.com/statue-of-david.html. Retrieved 2/14/12

http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/Donatello. Retrieved 2/14/12

Posts navigation

Newer Entries →
  • Recent Posts

    • Kenai Peninsula College Art Opening
    • Honoring the Ordinary Process
    • (no title)
    • (no title)
    • (no title)
  • Archives

    • August 2018
    • August 2016
    • October 2015
    • March 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • August 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • February 2014
    • November 2013
    • August 2013
    • April 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • September 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
  • Categories

    • Online Class
  • Meta

    • Create account
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • joelisaak
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • joelisaak
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...